Citizendium Blog

March 21, 2007

We aren’t Wikipedia

Filed under: Policy, Editors, Governance, Authors, Other projects, License, Constables — Larry Sanger @ 8:48 pm

Retrieved from “http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:We_aren%27t_Wikipedia

How is the Citizendium similar to Wikipedia? In quite a few ways. In enough ways that you might make you wonder why we’ve started another project. Consider:

  1. We aim to create a giant free general encyclopedia.
  2. We’re managed by a nonprofit.
  3. We use MediaWiki software.
  4. We use wiki methods of strong collaboration. We don’t sign articles or even have lead authors; we strongly encourage everybody to “be bold” and mix it up.
  5. No credentials are needed to participate (as an author).
  6. We still rely on “soft security” to a great extent. We mostly trust people and solve what few behavioral problems we’ve seen as they arise.
  7. We are committed to a neutral, unbiased presentation of information.
  8. We have similar naming conventions, and some other similar conventions.
  9. Quite a few of our articles came from Wikipedia.
  10. The community and project has been organized by the same person who organized Wikipedia.

Quite similar, it seems. But…

(more…)

So long Pilot…Hello EN!

Filed under: Project growth, Technology — Jason Potkanski @ 6:31 pm

“It’s 22 miles to Chicago, we have a full case of Pepsi, 3 out of 5 servers, It’s cloudy and I’m wearing pants. Hit it.” - Parodic Blues Brothers Quote.

en.citizendium.org now is handling all former pilot.citizendium.org traffic. No edits were lost in the brief transition. en is temporaily handling the entire database as we transition pilot into a dedicated database server role. Even though en is a quarter the power pilot is, en can handle more traffic than pilot.A lot of performance optimizations are on…most noticably caching. If there are any problems with page rendering, please report by email to bugs@

With the main wiki transferred, a lot of background work goes into place moving other parts of the site to other boxes. 2 ordered servers still are on the way. Other services must be juggled to other boxes so pilot can be reimaged clean.

-jtp 

March 19, 2007

Launch soon, finally

Filed under: Project growth, Press & blogs — Larry Sanger @ 9:06 pm

I’ll let Jason fill you in on the technical details, but we’ll be installing four new servers Tuesday, and our public launch should happen sometime not too long after that — by the end of March at the latest, but we have technical work as well as still considerable writing to do.  Major press coverage is already lined up to coincide with the launch, so it should be lots of fun.

(more…)

Alex Beam Hates Canada

Filed under: Press & blogs — Jason Potkanski @ 3:52 pm

Boston Globe columnist Alex Beam writes on his Wikipedia experience. He also mentions Citizendium in his opinion piece.

“I complained about my entry through Wikipedia’s dissent channel. Nothing happened. Then a friend slipped me a magic phone number that rang in the office of Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessig, the Learned Hand of the Internet bar. His helpful assistant relayed my complaint to Wales, who sits on a board with Lessig. Soon afterward, the offending paragraphs were removed.”

Magic wiki phone number?

 -Jason Potkanski

Tech Update: Week of March 19, 2007

Filed under: Technology, Developers — Jason Potkanski @ 3:40 pm
  • Confirmation of long overdue Server expansion, in place by Tuesday.
  • Proposed addition of three people to Technical Staff
  • Tinkered with Spam scoring for Email users of citizendium.org. High Scoring spam and spam thresholds reduced in MailScanner.
  • Small performance adjustment to Apache web server.
  • Performance adjustments, maintaince and cleanup of Postgresql database server.

Notice: Once servers are in place, site may go up and down without notice as we move services around on various servers.

-Jason Potkanski

March 15, 2007

The Big Cleanup kicks off

Filed under: Project growth — Larry Sanger @ 3:44 pm

I’d like to invite you to sign up to help with the Big Cleanup.

This is actually very important. Let me explain why.

It’s another pass through our entire corpus, similar (in that way) to “The Big Speedydelete” (which, I’d like to report to this blog, was a resounding success). But this new initiative will be considerably more useful than “The Big Speedydelete.”

When I sat down last night to list off all the benefits of the Big Cleanup, I was surprised at how many there were. Here are some of the benefits: we assign all articles to workgroups; we divide our body of articles into five categories, namely, approved, developed, developing, stub, and “external”; we give Wikipedia credit where we’ve borrowed their content; our articles look considerably “cleaner”; and more. But the benefit of assigning all of our articles to workgroups is particularly consequential.

We really need your help. It turns out that we have something like 2500 pages to go though. This means we need casual contributors to do one or two sets, and regular contributors to do even more. We probably have 1500-2000 actual pages with content–and not quite 1200 “CZ Live” articles. (Another benefit is that we give ourselves credit for all of our “live” articles.)

Interested in helping? Here is what you’d be doing. First, you’d go to The Big Cleanup/Signup and volunteer for a set of articles (a dozen in a set). Then, for each article, you’d go through a “to do” list. Sometimes you won’t have to do anything; sometimes you’ll have to do a few things. In either case it doesn’t usually take longer than a minute or two per article. Next, you click on the article’s discussion tab. You paste in the blank checklist (a template) and fill it in. This won’t usually take more than a minute or two. Out pops a bunch of useful categories.

If you want to skip straight to the sign-up page, here it is.

By the way, this is also a great way to get acquainted with our content and the people who have worked on it.

March 12, 2007

Tech Update: Week of March 12, 2007

Filed under: Project growth, Technology — Jason Potkanski @ 1:14 pm
  • Servers that have been on order from Steadfast should arrive and be installed sometime this week. I will provide a downtime window when I have exact details.
  • wgAllowUserJs is now on. This requested feature allows for users to add custom javascript to their skins and use timesaving tools such as Wiked or Popups.
  • CZ Namespace introduced (Id’s 100, 101 respectively).  All articles with Citizendium Pilot: were changed in the database to CZ: . This affects all revisions of an article, 8600 revisions in all.
  • Database cleanups, checkbox annoyances fixed.

-Jtp

March 10, 2007

What’s the best way for Web 2.0 to empower individuals?

Filed under: Experts, Web 2.0 — Larry Sanger @ 5:53 pm

Here’s something I cut from an essay I’m working on — but it stands on its own as a mini-essay.

The world is amazed by what global, self-selecting groups can do collaboratively — so much so that “You” are Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year.”  But few have considered, or anyway taken seriously, the ideas of requiring the use of real names, absolutely insisting on professional standards of behavior, and giving collaborative projects some gentle expert oversight.  To suggest that it is feasible to add these innovations — quite radical innovations, really, by Web 2.0 standards — is tantamount to suggesting that we can secure the stunning productivity of Web 2.0 without suffering the common ills of irresponsibility, obnoxious behavior, and mediocrity.  That is precisely the proposition on which the new Citizendium effort rests.  We are Web 2.0 with real names, fairly enforced rules, and a role for experts.

(more…)

March 6, 2007

Our launch plan

Filed under: Project growth — Larry Sanger @ 3:09 pm

I posted a launch plan a little while ago:

We’re going to launch quite soon.  No date is set, but a few weeks from now–as soon as possible.

As you may know, we have been putting off our launch (i.e., allowing the public to view the Citizendium) until we obtained the servers we need to handle the traffic.  Well, we’ve decided to go ahead and obtain four servers, for a total of five (two of these, and installation, kindly donated to the cause by Steadfast).  These should be installed this week, which means that launch is going to happen soon.

Beyond server work, there isn’t a lot of other technical work that we absolutely need to do in order to launch.  …

Also, if we can manage to do it before launch, I’d like to get the semi-automated application hand-approval system written and working, i.e., the system that will allow people to submit their registration on a Web form, and let constables get them into the system by pressing a button.  Even if we don’t finish this before launch, we’re already using a new method for getting people on board within a day (usually), via e-mail.  Thanks bunches to our constables for making that happen!

Other things I want to do before launch involve decisionmaking, organizing, writing, and wiki work–in other words, non-technical stuff.  This is all hard work, by the way.  Anyone who says that online projects grow “organically” really doesn’t know anything about it.  Even Wikipedia didn’t grow “organically”: it grew exactly to the extent that lots of individuals did various bits of very hard work, from writing articles, to debating policy, to formatting help pages, and so forth.  There is no substitute for our doing the same thing, if we want to make this thing happen.

And, by golly, it is going to happen–or rather, it is already happening!

Read more and comment here.

March 5, 2007

One last, brief comment on the Essjay scandal

Filed under: Web 2.0, Other projects — Larry Sanger @ 2:21 pm

Something just came to my notice about the Essjay scandal that removed all doubt on a certain point, which placed things into a clearer perspective.  I know I said I wouldn’t write anything else about the scandal, so I’ll be brief.

(more…)

« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress