Comments on: A sovereign community http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/ Weblog about the Citizendium project and its Citizens. Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:14:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Otto Kerner http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9678 Otto Kerner Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:39:58 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9678 Well, for sake of argument, what happens if one of the various balanced bodies does something that conflicts with what one of the other balanced bodies is doing? Well, for sake of argument, what happens if one of the various balanced bodies does something that conflicts with what one of the other balanced bodies is doing?

]]> By: Larry Sanger http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9770 Larry Sanger Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:15:25 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9770 The method for resolving such conflicts should be laid out in the Charter. It depends on the bodies in question. The method for resolving such conflicts should be laid out in the Charter. It depends on the bodies in question.

]]> By: Otto Kerner http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10069 Otto Kerner Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:36:45 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10069 So, basically, it has yet to be decided, right? It's a very nice-sounding idea, so I'll be interested in seeing the proof once the pudding is ready. So, basically, it has yet to be decided, right? It’s a very nice-sounding idea, so I’ll be interested in seeing the proof once the pudding is ready.

]]> By: Larry Sanger http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10071 Larry Sanger Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:50:34 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10071 Ah, but...you wouldn't judge the viability of a political idea on one example, would you? So even if we are a crashing failure, it will not prove anything about the possibility of genuine online self-government; it would only be one data point. What would it be, anyway, about being <i>online</i> that would make an constitutional republic impossible online? They're possible offline. Ah, but…you wouldn’t judge the viability of a political idea on one example, would you? So even if we are a crashing failure, it will not prove anything about the possibility of genuine online self-government; it would only be one data point.

What would it be, anyway, about being online that would make an constitutional republic impossible online? They’re possible offline.

]]> By: Citizendium Blog » Digitizing parliamentary procedure http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10368 Citizendium Blog » Digitizing parliamentary procedure Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:02:31 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10368 [...] http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/  [...] […] http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/  […]

]]> By: Social Synergy http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10719 Social Synergy Tue, 01 May 2007 17:28:43 +0000 http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10719 <strong>Citizendium: Sanger on Edge.org...</strong> Here are some thoughts on Larry Sanger's Who Says We Know? On the New Politics of Knowledge. Putting aside the loaded debate about collective intelligence vs. expert intelligence, there is actually a more important development here: One of the inheren... Citizendium: Sanger on Edge.org…

Here are some thoughts on Larry Sanger’s Who Says We Know? On the New Politics of Knowledge. Putting aside the loaded debate about collective intelligence vs. expert intelligence, there is actually a more important development here: One of the inheren…

]]>