<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A sovereign community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.citizendium.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172</link>
	<description>Weblog about the Citizendium project and its Citizens.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Synergy</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-10719</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Synergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10719</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Citizendium: Sanger on Edge.org...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are some thoughts on Larry Sanger's Who Says We Know? On the New Politics of Knowledge. Putting aside the loaded debate about collective intelligence vs. expert intelligence, there is actually a more important development here: One of the inheren...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Citizendium: Sanger on Edge.org&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here are some thoughts on Larry Sanger&#8217;s Who Says We Know? On the New Politics of Knowledge. Putting aside the loaded debate about collective intelligence vs. expert intelligence, there is actually a more important development here: One of the inheren&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizendium Blog &#187; Digitizing parliamentary procedure</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-10368</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizendium Blog &#187; Digitizing parliamentary procedure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10368</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-10071</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10071</guid>
		<description>Ah, but...you wouldn't judge the viability of a political idea on one example, would you?  So even if we are a crashing failure, it will not prove anything about the possibility of genuine online self-government; it would only be one data point.

What would it be, anyway, about being &lt;i&gt;online&lt;/i&gt; that would make an constitutional republic impossible online?  They're possible offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but&#8230;you wouldn&#8217;t judge the viability of a political idea on one example, would you?  So even if we are a crashing failure, it will not prove anything about the possibility of genuine online self-government; it would only be one data point.</p>
<p>What would it be, anyway, about being <i>online</i> that would make an constitutional republic impossible online?  They&#8217;re possible offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto Kerner</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-10069</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto Kerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-10069</guid>
		<description>So, basically, it has yet to be decided, right? It's a very nice-sounding idea, so I'll be interested in seeing the proof once the pudding is ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically, it has yet to be decided, right? It&#8217;s a very nice-sounding idea, so I&#8217;ll be interested in seeing the proof once the pudding is ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>The method for resolving such conflicts should be laid out in the Charter.  It depends on the bodies in question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The method for resolving such conflicts should be laid out in the Charter.  It depends on the bodies in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto Kerner</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=172#comment-9678</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto Kerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/04/26/a-sovereign-community/#comment-9678</guid>
		<description>Well, for sake of argument, what happens if one of the various balanced bodies does something that conflicts with what one of the other balanced bodies is doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for sake of argument, what happens if one of the various balanced bodies does something that conflicts with what one of the other balanced bodies is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
