<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia&#8217;s latest band-aid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.citizendium.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=221</link>
	<description>Weblog about the Citizendium project and its Citizens.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Baldwin-Edwards</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=221#comment-37815</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Baldwin-Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/09/21/wikipedias-latest-band-aid/#comment-37815</guid>
		<description>The reason that CZ doesn't have the Wikipedia problem with condescension and petty rivalries is, I think, exactly what is different about them. Two major differences: (1) CZ has real names and real people who feel some sort of social relationship with each other; (2) the actual editors on CZ are people who feel fairly secure about their abilities, and don't need to prove too much. The relationships between authors and editors is more tentative, but slowly is working out, I think.

In contrast, Wikipedia has real problems of contested status, infighting, and a general lack of respect for other people's real-life achievements. There is no quickfix for the WP problems...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that CZ doesn&#8217;t have the Wikipedia problem with condescension and petty rivalries is, I think, exactly what is different about them. Two major differences: (1) CZ has real names and real people who feel some sort of social relationship with each other; (2) the actual editors on CZ are people who feel fairly secure about their abilities, and don&#8217;t need to prove too much. The relationships between authors and editors is more tentative, but slowly is working out, I think.</p>
<p>In contrast, Wikipedia has real problems of contested status, infighting, and a general lack of respect for other people&#8217;s real-life achievements. There is no quickfix for the WP problems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ewen</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=221#comment-37147</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/09/21/wikipedias-latest-band-aid/#comment-37147</guid>
		<description>Dead indeed: http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dead indeed: <a href="http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges" rel="nofollow">http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=221#comment-37101</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/09/21/wikipedias-latest-band-aid/#comment-37101</guid>
		<description>Hi John, well, if you look into it, you'll see why it never went anywhere.  Enough said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, well, if you look into it, you&#8217;ll see why it never went anywhere.  Enough said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=221#comment-37090</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/09/21/wikipedias-latest-band-aid/#comment-37090</guid>
		<description>Cassiopedia (http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page)is another wiki that is basically Wikipedia with author applications having to be approved (though usernames need not be real names, nor is a user page obligatory). It copied Wikipedia's 1.4 million articles, and seems pretty dead right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassiopedia (http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page)is another wiki that is basically Wikipedia with author applications having to be approved (though usernames need not be real names, nor is a user page obligatory). It copied Wikipedia&#8217;s 1.4 million articles, and seems pretty dead right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
