<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A ideology-free &#8220;economic Manhattan project&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.citizendium.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381</link>
	<description>Weblog about the Citizendium project and its Citizens.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185779</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185779</guid>
		<description>Re whether Citizendium has an ideology, good question -- but I don't think so.  See our &lt;a href="http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Fundamentals" rel="nofollow"&gt;Statement of Fundamental Policies&lt;/a&gt;.  That's our draft "constitution."  It represents an ideology only if, for example, the U.S. Constitution does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re whether Citizendium has an ideology, good question &#8212; but I don&#8217;t think so.  See our <a href="http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Fundamentals" rel="nofollow">Statement of Fundamental Policies</a>.  That&#8217;s our draft &#8220;constitution.&#8221;  It represents an ideology only if, for example, the U.S. Constitution does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185731</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185731</guid>
		<description>Another question: does Citizendium have an ideology?  If so, what is it?  If not, what limitations does this impose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question: does Citizendium have an ideology?  If so, what is it?  If not, what limitations does this impose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sanger</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185732</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185732</guid>
		<description>Hmm--I guess "ideology" is commonly used to mean a world view that is held irrationally, but that isn't a core part of the meaning of the term.  There's nothing wrong with ideology or even being ideological (in the right contexts, of course), insofar as it means something similar to "world view, particularly in regards to politics and religion."  In saying that the social sciences, like economics, are inherently ideological, I mean that disagreements among theoreticians often come down to disagreements about deeper issues such as philosophy and politics.  They are hence not resolvable by some generally-agreed-upon methodology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8211;I guess &#8220;ideology&#8221; is commonly used to mean a world view that is held irrationally, but that isn&#8217;t a core part of the meaning of the term.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with ideology or even being ideological (in the right contexts, of course), insofar as it means something similar to &#8220;world view, particularly in regards to politics and religion.&#8221;  In saying that the social sciences, like economics, are inherently ideological, I mean that disagreements among theoreticians often come down to disagreements about deeper issues such as philosophy and politics.  They are hence not resolvable by some generally-agreed-upon methodology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185730</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=381#comment-185730</guid>
		<description>Larry,

Isn't the term "ideology" commonly (ab)used to imply mystical belief which is not subject to logic and reason?  Is this a disagreement of semantics, or are you using the same definition of "ideology" as those you are responding to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the term &#8220;ideology&#8221; commonly (ab)used to imply mystical belief which is not subject to logic and reason?  Is this a disagreement of semantics, or are you using the same definition of &#8220;ideology&#8221; as those you are responding to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
