Citizendium Blog

March 25, 2008

Major announcement about free education project forthcoming

Filed under: Funding, Open source, Other projects — Larry Sanger @ 4:36 pm

In a few weeks, a small group and I will be announcing a major new educational project, free and non-profit, with very significant funding from a retired businessman.  We will be meeting in New York City early next month, talking to some potential advisers and funders.  I am sorry to have to be so vague.  For now, suffice it to say that everyone will benefit, but school children most of all — and the effort will answer the petition I mentioned earlier, which I hope you will sign if you have not done so already.  That’s why I want to mention this, even without any detail: there are philanthropists who will get behind that sort of project.  I know, because I have met one; his generosity inspired that petition in the first place.  I also had to let out a little of the excitement!  The idea is a corker!

October 8, 2007

My thanks to many participants & partners

Filed under: Funding, Editors, Project growth, Authors — Larry Sanger @ 10:02 am

This is an early Thanksgiving.  It occurs to me that I have not thanked people enough, especially the hardest-working people.  I thank people all the time, but it is usually for over-and-above stuff, and when people first show up.  So, at the risk of embarrassing them, I’m going to thank a whole bunch of people.  I hope you don’t mind, folks.

But I should add something, because I don’t want this sort of attention to go to anybody’s head, either — I mean, frankly, I think it’s a little ridiculous that praise from me would go to anybody’s head.  Most people aren’t that way and they realize that I’m just this guy, so big deal.  But, you see, I’m worried and I speak from experience.  In listing these people and their useful work, I do not mean, in any way shape or form, to be establishing something like a project aristocracy.  I can imagine that some people might be puffed up by this sort of attention, and think that such recognition gives them rights in the project that others do not have.  That would be very wrongheaded.  In fact, not to malign them unjustly I hope, but certain Wikipedians seem to carry about their titles and achievements and “barnstars” and whatnot as so many bludgeons that they can use to get their way.  Damn me if that ever happens on the Citizendium.  I have sometimes accused Wikipedia of being egalitarian in a bad, utopian way, but in this regard I would like CZ to be *more* egalitarian than WP.  I would like us to settle content disputes by kindly, rational compromise first, by reference to expert knowledge second, and by fair, open, law-governed dispute resolution processes last — but NEVER by a presumption that “I’ve been here
longer, I’m a Big Shot, so you gotta listen to me and my friends, or else!” We should always be a freer, more open, and indeed more equal community than that cliquish, competitive attitude implies.

And if you would never dream of being that way — well, clearly, I’m not talking about *you*.

That said in preface, here’s the rogue’s gallery from the Citizendium’s first year, in alphabetical order, and what I honor them for.  And I’m very sorry if I left anyone out, or if I failed to mention some shining achievement of yours — I’m just going based on what I remember and what I had personal experience with, and the project is already bigger than I can always personally track.  But yes, I do actually know all these people and am at least somewhat acquainted with their work for the project!  I am sure I must have left out some hard-working people, some may have slipped through the cracks, and I’m sorry that I did…

Click through to the list.

October 4, 2007

Why support Citizendium: CZ as a solution

Filed under: Funding, Project growth — Larry Sanger @ 11:53 am

From a grant proposal.

In some ways, the Citizendium works similarly to Wikipedia: an open, bottom-up wiki, a wide variety of people may join and contribute to whatever topic they want, whenever they want. The interface, using MediaWiki software, is fairly simple and easy for any reasonably technically adept person to learn. This system has allowed the Citizendium, like Wikipedia, to create thousands of articles in a short time. Yet the project is truly a by-the-bootstraps operation; when first announced, the project had a zero budget, and has been able to survive for a year on little more than $40,000 in donations and with one full-time employee.

But Citizendium’s differences with Wikipedia have proven extremely consequential and successful. Because the Citizendium requires the use of real names and biographies, there has been virtually no vandalism; furthermore, the community is mature and collegial, yet still dynamic. Because the Citizendium has a guiding role for experts, articles tend to be of remarkably high quality. Moreover, there are over 40 approved articles and over 600 “developed” articles, i.e., articles close to approval.

In addition, the Citizendium has recently enabled contributors to add various other kinds of reference information: bibliographies, external links, tables, image galleries, timelines, and much else. There is a particular need for an enhancement to MediaWiki that would incorporate these different types of information into the software. With support, the Citizendium Foundation could hire a programmer who would transform the text-oriented MediaWiki platform into something that handles all different sorts of information intelligently. The Citizendium, in turn, would show the world how to use the software.

Support for an administrative assistant would also help the project to do a serious recruitment drive; until now, most people have arrived via the many mentions of Citizendium in the technical press. Similarly, support for a development director would help the project tap into the no doubt millions of dollars that are available for a project that has already proven itself in this way.

In short, while the Citizendium has already shown that it has the potential to solve Wikipedia’s problems, further support would make this assured.

May 30, 2007

Why donate to the Citizendium?

Filed under: Funding — Larry Sanger @ 12:40 pm

I’ve been working quite a bit lately on fundraising issues. This was overdue, even if it means I’m not on the wiki as much. Our fundamentals are such that we could be raising a lot of money–but because I am usually so focused on getting this project off the ground, and not on fundraising, we haven’t raised so much money recently, or not since last year (when I was working on it! :-) ).

We now have a seven-page PDF prospectus that I can send to parties that might contemplate supporting CZ with a major donation. Let me know.

There is also now an explanation–as if you needed one–for why folks ought to contribute regularly to CZ: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Donate

Ongoing thanks to Kelly Patterson for helping as Fundraising Assistant. For that matter, thanks to the Executive Committee, which has helped in various ways, and thanks to everyone for making the whole thing possible!

May 14, 2007

Shop online, support Citizendium

Filed under: Funding, Project growth — Larry Sanger @ 2:51 pm

Want a book, game, or other merchandise of a sort that you buy online?  Then, if you get it from Amazon or Barnes & Noble,

                  please order it through us!

We get 6% of the price you pay — and that adds up!

Let’s give credit where it’s due, Nancy Sculerati, Kelly Patterson, and Jason Potkanski have set up affiliate programs with Amazon and Barnes & Noble, and have been at work on various aspects of our fundraising efforts.  Thanks!

Already, 14 items have been ordered and 8 items shipped from Amazon, which has raised our referral rate (i.e., the percentage of the price you pay that we receive) from 4% to 6%.  We’ve actually received some money already, and we’re very glad to have it.  We’ll announce a dollar amount when we get into four figures.  :-)

With luck, we’ll have even more fundraising news to announce soon.

February 14, 2007

Slashdotted again! OK: we’ll be launching soon.

Filed under: Funding, Project growth, Press & blogs — Larry Sanger @ 6:42 am

Geez, won’t those guys leave our poor little server alone?  Apparently not.

I took the opportunity to explain that, by getting just a few more servers, we could launch pretty soon, i.e., on the order of weeks, not months.  The number of servers we can afford is not a scalable solution, however.  Therefore, we will probably soon be forced to beg shamelessly for funds for more servers.  But Yes!  We can do that! :)

January 24, 2007

Second press release is out!

Filed under: Funding, Project growth, Press & blogs — Larry Sanger @ 7:57 am

Posted here, but here’s a copy for the blog archives:

Media Contact:
Maggie Quale
FortyThree, Inc.
831.621.3773
citizendium@fortythreepr.com          
 

Citizendium Pilot Project Open For Public Contribution - Project Announces Non-Profit Status

Columbus, Ohio – January 24, 2007 – The Citizendium, a project aimed at creating a new free encyclopedia online, announced today that its pilot project has been a success, and that it is moving rapidly toward a public launch. For the first time, anyone can visit the website (www.citizendium.org), create a user account and get to work within minutes. The project, started by a founder of Wikipedia, aims to improve on the Wikipedia model by adding “gentle expert oversight” and requiring contributors to use their real names.

(more…)

November 11, 2006

Wanted: Hardware for Citizendium.

Filed under: Funding, Project growth — Jason Potkanski @ 9:13 am

It is becoming obvious that with the amount of data we have to deal with that our current hardware situation is grossly inadequate.

In English, we need a Database server ASAP! Specifically, We could use a U320+ SCSI Card with True Hardware RAID and at least 4 15K RPM SCSI disk of at least 36GB. Server RAM in 2GB+ sticks great too. Donations of equipment or money extremely welcome.

Paypal Donations:

Send checks to: The Citizendium Foundation, P.O. Box 146, Mount Hermon, CA, 95041.

-Jason Potkanski
Technical Team, Citizendium Executive Committee

(more…)

November 1, 2006

Foundation interest

Filed under: Funding — Larry Sanger @ 11:44 pm

I’m very happy to report that I’ll be speaking to two different major foundations in the next few days.  Nothing is promised yet, but the fact that they have approached us to talk is an excellent sign.  We do have a significant seed grant in our new Citizendium Foundation bank account, from a third foundation.  There are several other earlier contacts and leads to follow up on from previous weeks, as well.

October 30, 2006

Two new essays

Filed under: Experts, Funding — Larry Sanger @ 7:55 pm

I’ve posted two essays to citizendium.org that help explain the thinking behind and plans for the Citizendium.

Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0? (text of keynote at SDForum from last October 24) You can watch a video of the Q&A.

There’s a bit of conventional wisdom about Web 2.0 that is wrong. According to this conventional wisdom, Web 2.0 involves bringing the power of publishing to the masses. It’s all about harnessing the “wisdom of crowds” and not the wisdom of experts. So, a project that gives experts a special role couldn’t be a Web 2.0 project–even if the expert’s role were part of an online, open, dynamic, collaborative community.

This conventional wisdom is wrong. Experts can have a special and positive role in Web 2.0 projects, or so I’ll argue. As we’ll see, it’s quite understandable why so many people dislike the idea of special experts in open, online collaboration. But, as it turns out, there is no good reason that Web 2.0 projects cannot make room for experts.

So this talk will be argumentative. I’m a philosopher, so it’s probably going to sound a little like a philosophy paper. Sorry about that. Anyway, I’ll begin with an explanation of what Web 2.0 is, as I understand it, and I’ll explain what makes it work. Then I’ll elaborate my claim that experts can and should be given special roles in Web 2.0 projects. Then I’ll spend a lot of time replying to objections.

The Role of Content Brokers in the Era of Free Content (articulates the Citizendium Foundation’s concept for funding free content)

So here’s the proposal: the public presents an offer for a specific sum to go to someone who will write authoritatively on such-and-such a subject; the broker selects the content creator, who creates the content; and then the broker releases the content to the public, free for all (under, for example, a Creative Commons license). The buyers are still the general public, but are expanded to include groups of people, clubs, schools, universities, organizations, governments, and other entities that pay for the work on behalf of the general public. The sellers are still communicators and artists. The brokers can still include editors, designers, and other publishing industry professionals.

This is the concept referred to mysteriously in the FAQ as a “funding model (we think it is exciting and innovative) that will be revealed in good time.”

Powered by WordPress