Difference between revisions of "Knowledge"

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stefan Olejniczak
("knmowledge" was double)
imported>John Stephenson
(links; formatting)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{TOC|right}}
{{TOC|right}}


'''Knowledge''' is the central topic of the [[philosophy|philosophical]] subdiscipline of [[epistemology]].  A good place to begin with this topic is by explaining why most philosophers do distinguish between knowledge on one hand and both truth and belief on the other hand.
'''Knowledge''' is the central topic of the [[philosophy|philosophical]] subdiscipline of [[epistemology]].  A good place to begin with this topic is by explaining why most philosophers do distinguish between knowledge on one hand and both [[truth]] and [[belief]] on the other hand.


Firstly, knowledge is said to differ from truth for the simple reason that not all truths are known; in other words, there are undiscovered truths.  Some people (including some philosophers) are apt to respond to this by asking, "What sort of thing is an undiscovered truth?"  This is an [[ontology|ontological]] issue, however, and most of us will probably be satisfied if we simply give examples. For instance, the [[second law of thermodynamics]] was already true prior to its being discovered in the 19th century.
Firstly, knowledge is said to differ from truth for the simple reason that not all truths are known; in other words, there are undiscovered truths.  Some people (including some philosophers) are apt to respond to this by asking, "What sort of thing is an undiscovered truth?"  This is an [[ontology|ontological]] issue, however, and most of us will probably be satisfied if we simply give examples. For instance, the [[second law of thermodynamics]] was already true prior to its being discovered in the 19th century.
Line 10: Line 10:
However, 'knowledge' is very often used in a looser way to refer to any form of truth or belief, a whole body of truth or a whole system of belief. For "knowledge" in this latter sense, see [[world view]], [[ideology]], and [[religion]].
However, 'knowledge' is very often used in a looser way to refer to any form of truth or belief, a whole body of truth or a whole system of belief. For "knowledge" in this latter sense, see [[world view]], [[ideology]], and [[religion]].


==Notes==
==Footnotes==
<references/>
{{reflist|2}}
<br><hr>

Latest revision as of 12:51, 14 February 2021

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Knowledge is the central topic of the philosophical subdiscipline of epistemology. A good place to begin with this topic is by explaining why most philosophers do distinguish between knowledge on one hand and both truth and belief on the other hand.

Firstly, knowledge is said to differ from truth for the simple reason that not all truths are known; in other words, there are undiscovered truths. Some people (including some philosophers) are apt to respond to this by asking, "What sort of thing is an undiscovered truth?" This is an ontological issue, however, and most of us will probably be satisfied if we simply give examples. For instance, the second law of thermodynamics was already true prior to its being discovered in the 19th century.

Secondly, knowledge is said to differ from belief because we believe many things when we do not really know them.[1]

However, 'knowledge' is very often used in a looser way to refer to any form of truth or belief, a whole body of truth or a whole system of belief. For "knowledge" in this latter sense, see world view, ideology, and religion.

Footnotes

  1. Some philosophers are even capable of saying that we can have knowledge of a fact without believing it. Cf. Colin Radford, "Knowledge--By Examples." (complete reference needed).